Google might consider to be “quality content” and adds his own thoughts and tips based on his experience in the SEO industry.
We’ve all heard that quality written substance makes all the difference and that you have to compose great substance, or now “10x substance,” as authored by Rand Fishkin. Ask SEOs what “quality substance” is and you’ll get a great deal of differed and obstinate answers. Quality is abstract, and every individual perspectives it in an unexpected way.
Ask SEOs what Google considers to be quality substance, and you will get a ton of clear gazes. I know since I get a kick out of the chance to ask this a great deal.
The main answer I get, unfortunately, is that substance ought to be x number of words, where x is typically 200, 300, 500, 700, 1,000, 1,500, or 2,000. More substance improves content. A basic question about the age of an on-screen character can be completely replied in a sentence and doesn’t require their biography and filmography.
Another answer I get is that the substance ought to be “applicable.” The issue with this is low-quality pages can be significant too.
Different SEOs I’ve asked have given incredibly itemized answers from licenses or thoughts from machine finding out about word2vec, RankBrain, profound learning, tally based strategies and prescient techniques.
